cover image: Legislative Assembly Debates Monday  12th December  1932

Premium

20.500.12592/nsv65h

Legislative Assembly Debates Monday 12th December 1932

1932

Is it a fact that the Auditor General in India at the time of introducing the time scale of pay in 1922 had held that pay was not the criterion for purposes of seniority and that this rule still holds good in the Posts and Telegraphs and 'Civil Accounts -Offices and the Office of the Director of Railway Audit and is generally applicable to the staff of the Railway Board also? [...] Is it a fact that subsequently having regard to the combined charge of Delhi and Ajmer-Merwara the Head Clerk of the Superintendent of Education's office was given a special pay from the Ajmer-Merwara budget on the ground that the pay originally fixed for the Head Clerk *was for the Delhi Province work only? [...] mensem was granted to a clerk in the office of the Honourable the Agent to the Governor General in Central India for the work of the Central India Education Department. [...] The question of entrusting the supervision of the clerks dealing with the Central India section to the Head Clerk of the Superintendent's office is being considered. [...] The classes in Arabic and Persian in the Siddiqia School Delhi are not recognised by the Education Department but no objection has ever been raised by the Board of Secondary Education or by the Superintendent of Education Delhi to the retention of these classes nor has the present Superintendent of Education ever discouraged the management of the school from continuing these classes.
government politics public policy
Pages
88
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100003
Segment Pages Author Actions
Frontmatter
i-i unknown view
Legislative Assembly
3057-3143 unknown view