Proceedings of the Legislative Council of the United Provinces Saturday July 3 1926 Official Report

I beg to move that after the scale and before the proviso the following be added :— Where the proprietors of a mahal do not own specific areas in severalty the cultivated area owned by each proprietor in the mahal shall for the purposes of the scale be deemed to be such portion of the total cultivated area of the mahal as is proportionate to the extent of his proprietary right in the mahal." [...] Hon'ble Sir Sam O'Donnell : I beg to move that in the second proviso line 2 after the word extinguished " be added the words "and the proprietor or permanent tenure-holder has not in the meantime transferred his right in the land." also in line 3 of the second proviso for the words " the sir of the proprietor" substitute the words " his sir or the sir of his heir as the case may be." Clause [...] The section obviously cotemplates that on the extinction of occupancy rights the land shall again become the sir of the original proprietor and not of the subsquent proprietor having obtained the property by transfer or othewise in the meantime. [...] My amendment to add the words "and the proprietor or permanent tenure-holder has not in the meantime tranferred his right in the land " after the word " extinguished " in line 2 of the second proviso and the substitution of the words " his sir or the sir of his heir as the case may be " in line 3 of the proviso will make this clear. [...] For the words after become " the following be substituted :— " Land of the co-parcenary body of co-sharers or the landlord as the case may be." Hon'ble the President : The honourable member should have moved an amendment to the Hon'ble the Finance Member's amendment.