cover image: The Indian Decisions (New Series)  Being a re-print of all the Decisions of the Privy Council on appeals from India and of the various High Courts and other Supreme Courts in India related both in the official and non-official reports from 1875  Bombay  (1887-1888) I.L.R. 11 and 12 Bombay

Premium

20.500.12592/232drx

The Indian Decisions (New Series) Being a re-print of all the Decisions of the Privy Council on appeals from India and of the various High Courts and other Supreme Courts in India related both in the official and non-official reports from 1875 Bombay (1887-1888) I.L.R. 11 and 12 Bombay

1914

Letters of administra tion to D. ’s estate were granted to his widow, the defendant, The plaintiff claimed a share in D. ’s estate, contending that he was the widower of J one of the daughters of the intestate, and entitled, as such, under s. 5 of the Parsi Intestate Succession Act XXI of 1865. [...] Inverarity, I hesitate to use the different forms in which the Act I have to interpret was placed before the Legislative Council, in order to infer the probable intention of the framers in passing the section in question although the remark of the Lord Chancellor on the Act of Uniformity in the case of Hebbert v. Purchas (2) is cited for the defendants as being not only a discussion of facts of h [...] Haji Ootnar Khamesa assigned the decree to the plaintiff in the present suit, and subsequently to the assignment (viz. , on the 21st July 1883) the defendants executed to the plaintiff the mortgage on which the present suit was brought. [...] Haji Oomar Khamesa assigned the said decree to the plaintiff in the present suit and subsequently to the assignment (viz. , on 21st July, 1883), the defendants executed to the plaintiff the mortgage on which the present suit was brought. [...] The mortgage-deed, after reciting the facts above set forth, stated that the defendants had agreed to satisfy the amount of the said decree to the plaintiff in the manner therein mentioned and it contained a covenant by the defendants that they would pay ils.
law
Pages
1100
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100024
Segment Pages Author Actions
Frontmatter
i-xvi The Lawyer’s Companion Office, Trichinopoly and Madras view
I.L.R. 11 Bombay
1-482 The Lawyer’s Companion Office, Trichinopoly and Madras view
I.L.R. 12 Bombay
483-948 The Lawyer’s Companion Office, Trichinopoly and Madras view
General Index
949-1084 The Lawyer’s Companion Office, Trichinopoly and Madras view

Related Topics

All