The Indian Decisions (New Series) Being a re-print of all the decisions of the Privy Council on appeals from India and of the various High Courts and other Superior Courts in India reported both in the official and non-official reports from 1875 Bombay (1889-1890) I.L.R. 13 and 14 Bombay

" " 3. From the books of the said company I find that the said Nusservanji Dadabhoy Katruck acted as one of the directors of the said company from the 24th day of August, 1885, and continued acting as such director till the resolution for winding up the said company was passed on the 22nd day of July, 1886, and attended thirty-one out of thirty-four meetings of the board of directors of the said c [...] 200 a month from the 13th July as manager on his behalf of the said company, and that on the 18th June he accepted these terms ; that he continued to manage the business of the company and of the said Premchand Roychand, and that on or about the 7th August 1885 the said Premcband Roychand being desirous of securing the benefit of hig advice and experience on the board of directors of the company p [...] On the 7th May, inspection was given to the plaintiff's solicitor of the plaintiff's horoscope, and after that inspection the plaintiff's solicitor proposed that the plaint and proceedings should be [11] amended by the insertion of the name of the father of the pItintiff as her next friend. [...] It was argued that until the name of the carrying ship was declared to the plaintiff as purchaser neither the ship nor the coal was assigned to the contract, and therefore the loss could not be within the contract. [...] Ths appropriation of certain goods to the contract by the vendors (the defend- ants), the placing them on board the Rubens, and doing all in their power to deuatch them to Bombay in ftelfilin7ent of the contract, were enough to entitle them to the protection of the last clause of the agreement.