The Indian Law Reports Bombay Series Containing Cases Determined by the High Court at Bombay and by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on Appeal from that Court 1890

Bichook Nath PIInday v. Ram Lochmun Singh . 203, 276 31:1)25- . Billiard Ex parte . Billings v. The Uncovenanted Service Bank . Bird v. Brown . 66 Birjoo Singh v. Khub 'Lall . 343 Birkett In re . 5 Bissessur Lal Sahoo v. Luchmessur Singh . 604 Blackford v. Preston. [...] . 138, 348 Blackwell v. England . , r. ,50 Blaiklock v. Grindle . , . f39 Bombay Electrical Company, Limited, In re . 198 Bonham In re . :216 Boo Jin atboo v. Sha Nagar Valabkanji . 280 . -) Bowie In re . 43 Brassington v. Llewwellyn 227 Breull Ex parte Brinsmead v. Harrison . -)1ff; Bryant In re . 195 Buckland v. Johnson . 116 Bulakhidas v. Keshavlal . [...] Darla() v. Kesho Rai . 50 Daulatram v. Mehr Chand . 597 Dawkins v. Lord Rokeby . 99 Dayachand Hemchand v. Hemchand Dharmchand , . 629 Dayal Jairaj v. Khatav Ladha . 224 Deane v. Thwaite . 421 Deendyal's Case . 602 Delhi and London Bank v. Wordie . 355 Denobun,dhoo Chowdhry v. Krishtomonee Dossee . 33 Derby (Earl of) v. Bury Improvident Commissioners [...] Kallynauth Shaw v. iajeeblocham Mozoonidar . 31 Kamat v. Kamat . 453 Kamalam v. Sadagopa Sami . 93 Kannock Chunder Mookerji v. Guru Pass Biswas . 55 Kantoolal's Case . 324 Karim Mahomed Jamal v. Rajooma . 33 Kashibai v. Tatia . 251 Kashirain-Vishnu Kamat v. Narayan Copal . is Kemble v. Farren . 276 Kendall v. Hamilton . 411; Kerr v. Haynes . 5r I Kesh [...] Kliaritg Singh v. Bitola Nath . 205 Khemji Bhagyandas Gujar v. Rama . 270, 379, 580 Kherodemoney Dossee v. Doorgamoney Dossee . 481, 485 Khettur Moonee Dossee v. Kasheenath Doss . 253 Khodabhai Mahiji v. Bandar Dala . 607 Khuda Bakhsh v. Sheo Din . 320 Khushal Panachand v. Bhimabai . 15 Kimbray v. Draper . 255 King v. Hoare