The Indian Law Reports Bombay Series Containing Cases Determined by the High Court at Bombay and by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on Appeal from that Court 1906

v. (400lam Hoosein 304 Moosa Haji Joonas v. Haji Abdul Advocate General of Bombay v. Adam- Rahim 197 Motilal v. Govindram 83 hmeclabad Advance Spinning and Surajmal v. 167 Nusserwanji v. Layman Weaving Company v. Lakshmishan- 452 Paul Beier v. Chotalal Iiai Jaiji v N. C. Macleod 493 ILaghunath v. Varjivandas 578 hagwandas v. Kanji 205 Rnstomji Jijibhai, are 341 age. [...] Banechand v. Dhondi Dahi v. Hargovandas -Hansa v. Abdulla v. Kashaba hanlj i v. Brito tau v. Raghunath avanishimkar v. Timmanna. [...] idaji v. Illathurabai srves Haji Mahamul v. !Jainudin 'attou v. Ratuchandra Page 426 455 122 415 226 229 508 152 603 119 Ganpat v. Anna Girjabai v. Raghunath Girjashankar v. Gopalji v. Ranchhod Kharsetji v. Minalal Shadiram Krishlabai v. Manohar. [...] 113 Surat City Municipality v. Chunilal v. of 570 Town Municipality of jambusar r. Gir- Secretary State Paudurang v. Nagu 598 jashanker Parmappa v. Shiddappa 607 Trimbakrao v. 1 Ramappa v. Manna 625 Vadilal v. Fulchand 81 Yellappa v. Desayappa Ganpat Ramaya v. Devappa 109 Yesa bin Rama v. Sakharam Gopal. [...] Shivpanch Lingapa Shivji Hasam v. Datu Mavji Shivlal Kalidas v. Jumaklal Nathiji Desai Shyama Charan Mitter v. Debendra Nath Mukerjee, Sidebotham, Ex parte Simpson v. Clayton Sitabai v. Wasantrao Sitarambhat v. Sitamm Ganesh Smith v. Ludha Ghella Damodar Sohna v. Khalak Singh Sonshet Antushet Teli v. Vishnu Babaji Johari.