Ramasami v. Bagirathi . 180 Rdmasami v. Marimuttu . 401 Ramksami v. Sesha . 181 Ranga v. Sithaya . 368 Sarni v. SOmasumlram . 119 Sdminddha v. The South Indian Railway Company . 420 Samuel v. Ananthanatha . 351 Sanjivi v. Errapa . 290 Sesha v Pa. ppuvarada . 185 Shair Mull v. SingaravOlu . 294 Short v. l'ickering . 138 Sitarrundsdmi v. Midatana . - . 400 karaya v. Krishna . [...] Venkat6sappa . 49 SutlAtyVan v. Nagasdmi . 155 Subramania v. Venkata . 254 Subramanya v. Appasami . 355 Subramanya v. The Secretary of State for India . 361 Subramanyan, Petition of . 187 Teramath v. Lakshmi . 270 The Secretary of State for India v. Nily. maam . 406 Timmappa:, a v. Lakshminartlyana . 284 Tippayya v. Venkata 74 Tiruvengada v. Ranga . 114 Tiruvengada v. Vy [...] v. Ramdatjain . 422 Varada v. Krishnastimi . 117 Vasudeva v. Nardyana . 121 Vengamuthu v. Pandav6swara . 161 Venkatakrishna v. Coelho 170 Venkattuninal v. Andyappa . 130 Venkataramdna v. Srinivasa . 102 Venkdyya v. Kotayya . 153 Virappa v. Kathana . 428 Virardgava v. Krishnasdmi . 344 Virardma v. Annasami . 359 virasdmi v. Subba . 64 Vythilinga v. Sundarappa . 167 Vythilin [...] The proceedings in the suit, from the hearing by the District Judge of Tinnevelly to the decree of the Divisional Bench of the High Court, are reported in I. L. R. , 3 Madras, 370, where the judgment of the Chief Justice Sir W. Morgan and of Muttusami Ayyar J. , is printed at page 373. [...] The plaintiff in his plaint also alleged that the zamindari was the self-acquired property of the late zamindar, and, moreover, that the debt acknowledged by the razinama was a just one, having been contractedby the late zamindar for the upkeep of the zamin- tiri, for the liquidation of debts contracted on the liability of the whole zamindari before the birth of the defendant, and for the benefit