cover image: The All India Reporter  1928 - Calcutta Section  Containing Full reports of all reportable Judgments of the Calcutta High Court reported in (1) I.L.R. 55 Calcutta  (2) 47 & 48 Calcutta Law Journal (3) 32 Calcutta Weekly Notes (4) 9 & 10 All India Criminal Reports  (5) 29 Criminal Law Journal (6) 106 to 112 Indian Cases with extra Judgments  Citation: A.I.R. 1928 Calcutta

Premium

20.500.12592/6bgpt7

The All India Reporter 1928 - Calcutta Section Containing Full reports of all reportable Judgments of the Calcutta High Court reported in (1) I.L.R. 55 Calcutta (2) 47 & 48 Calcutta Law Journal (3) 32 Calcutta Weekly Notes (4) 9 & 10 All India Criminal Reports (5) 29 Criminal Law Journal (6) 106 to 112 Indian Cases with extra Judgments Citation: A.I.R. 1928 Calcutta

1928

52—The doctrine of suspen- sion of rent depends solely upon"SUBJECT INDEX, 1928 CALCUTTA 13- Bengal Tenancy Act the fact that the rent due is an entire sum in respect of the land demised 479b S. 52--Reduction in the area of holding—No stipulation in the patta that tenant would not be entitled to any reduction of rent—Tenant is entitled to the ,Hroportionate reduction of jama406a S. 52 (1) (a)—Inte [...] 87—A b and onnlent —Ten ant of a non-transferable occupancy holding leaving the village in Falgun 1324—Landlord giving a settlement of the holding in Baisakh 1325—Sub-lease by the tenant in Ashar 1325 and two days later sale of a portion of the holding — Period was too short for abandonment and the lease and sale did not amount to a transfer 891b S. 87—Part of holding sold in 1908—Subsequent parti [...] 153 —Rent—When a decree is given at the rate of rent ad- mitted by the defendants it is not a case of determination of the annual rent payable as men- tioned in S. 153 512a S. 153—No declaration as to amount of rent in the decree— Question as to amount annually payable by tenant actually de- cided—Exception to S. 153 ap- plies and the order is appeal- able 254 S. 155—Lease—Miras karsha lease—Coven [...] 538—Provisions are not applicable to a suit for pay- ment of money of the Provi- dent Fund 743a S. 538—Special period of limitation does not apply to a suit by the son for the recovery of Provident Fund of an em- ployee of the Corporation 512a S. 557 (a)—New procedure prescribed by Act 5 of 1926 is to be applied to contravention Calcutta Municipal Act of the old Act as well as the new Act 207 Calc [...] 114—Failure of a District Board to prove the actual ac- quisition and possession and the actual . -delivery of certain land to it by the Government—In- tention of the Government to acquire the land and itp taking some necessary steps in pur- suance thereof proved—It was held to be not wrong to pre- sume that necessary steps for the acquisition of the land and for the transfer of the same to the pub
law
Pages
956
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100039
Segment Pages Author Actions
Frontmatter
1-60 G.S. Rao, Sudish Roy, M.V. Joshi view
The All India Reporter 1928 Calcutta High Court
1-896 G.S. Rao, Sudish Roy, M.V. Joshi view

Related Topics

All