cover image: The All India Reporter  1930 - Calcutta Section  Containing Full reports of all reportable Judgments of the Calcutta High Court reported in (1) I.L.R. 57 Calcutta  (2) 51 & 52 Calcutta Law Journal  (3) 31 Calcutta Weekly Notes  (4) 31 Criminal Law Journal  (5) 121 to 128 Indian Cases  (6) 1930 Criminal Cases  (7) 13 & 14 All India Criminal Reports with extra Judgments  Citation: A.I.R. 1930 Calcutta

Premium

20.500.12592/q8wsgj

The All India Reporter 1930 - Calcutta Section Containing Full reports of all reportable Judgments of the Calcutta High Court reported in (1) I.L.R. 57 Calcutta (2) 51 & 52 Calcutta Law Journal (3) 31 Calcutta Weekly Notes (4) 31 Criminal Law Journal (5) 121 to 128 Indian Cases (6) 1930 Criminal Cases (7) 13 & 14 All India Criminal Reports with extra Judgments Citation: A.I.R. 1930 Calcutta

1930

Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act (3 of 1913), S. 20—Sale of patni taluq not confirmed—Patni taluq sold under Regulation (8 of 1819), S. 14 —Latter sale is not bade 599a Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act (3 of 1913) S. 20—Sale of pat ni taluq not con- firmed—Patni taluq sold under Regula- tion (8 of 1819), S. 14—Latter sale is not bad— Bengal Regulation (8 of 1819), S. 14 599a Bengal Public [...] 11—Breach of contract in taking delivery of goods—Dispute referred to arbitration—Award filed in Court—Ex- ecution taken out—Deposit of amount under award in Court under protest— Suit by purchaser for declaration that award is invalid—Suit decided in favour of purchaser, bub important finding in favour of seller—Findings as to breach of contract by purchaser necessary for decision in that case, bu [...] tration followed by proper certificate of registration—Subsequent alteration by Registrar of his own accord does not affect validity of debentures between parties to it 536a, Compromise It is duty of counsel to consult client before consenting to decree — Decree should not be enforced in case of omission to do so—Legal practitioner— Civil P. C. , O. 3, R. 1 477 Contempt of Court —Power of High Cour [...] 297 and 299 — Plea of right of private defence could have been put for- ward as disclosed from cross-examina- Criminal P. C. tion of prosecution witnesses but not put forward — Charge to jury expressly calling upon jury not to consider plea of private right of defence amounts to mis- direction—Duty of Court explained 442b S. 297 — Charges to jury must be few, simple and easily capable of expla- na [...] 298—It is the duty of Judge to place facts clearly before jury and ex- plain law with reference to points of determination — Merely reading out head-notes or portions of reported cases is dangerous—Plea of private defence— Merely indicating argument is not suffi- cient—Law about it must be explained 434b S. 298—It is not duty of Judge to accept and interpret unintelligible ver- dict 320b S. 298 —
law
Pages
879
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100039
Segment Pages Author Actions
Frontmatter
1-55 unknown view
The All India Reporter 1930 Calcutta High Court
1-824 unknown view

Related Topics

All