The all India Reporter 1939 - Rangoon Section with Parallel References to (1) 1939 Rangoon Law Reports (2) 40 Criminal Law Journal (3) 179 to 184 Indian Cases Citation: A.I.R. 1939 (Rangoon)

vertisement with photograph of that actress reproduced from original one — Proprietor of latter cinema company knowing or hav- ing reason to suspect that owner of journal would publish photograph in infringement of copyright — There is “authorization” of infringement of copyright by latter cinema company 266c Costs—Taxation of — Administration suit — Official referee directing payment of costs of [...] It is ordinarily the duty of an advocate to be present or to make suitable arrangements for the conduct of the case and the Courts are not to be inconvenienced by the postponement of cases until the proper advocate is available. [...] To act for a client in Court is to take on his behalf in the Court or in the offices of the Court the necessary steps that must be taken in the course of the litigation in order that his case may be properly laid before the Court : 19 W R (Cr) 8 and 6 Cal 585 Approved. [...] 175 of 1937 Sharpe J. — In the month of July 1935 the plaintiff was minded to sue the two defendants for the purpose of obtaining a declaration that a certain registered deed of dissolution of partnership was inoperative and invalid and to that end he executed a power of attorney on the 18th of that month nominating and appointing Mr. [...] But as that case has been cited I do desire in passing and nowise in connexion with the present ap- peal to remind those practising at the Bar in Burma “that it is ordinarily the duty of an advocate to be present or to make suit- able arrangements for the conduct of the case,” and that the Courts are not to be inconvenienced by the postponement of cases until the proper advocate is available.