The All India Reporter 1950 - Dacca Section with parallel references to (1) Pak Cases 1950 Dacca 92) 51 Criminal Law Journal Citation: A.I.R. (37) 1950 Dacca

ties in suit sold at auction on 22nd November 1931 that the landlord purchased the said pro- perties and took porssion thereof sometime in June 1932 that defendant 1 obtained a benami settlement of the sal land from the landlord in the name of defendant 3 on 14th December 1935 and again had the same sold in the benami of his wife defendant 2 and after that created a mortgage in favour of defen- da [...] They denied all the material allegations of the plaintiff and averred that the plain- tiff's interest in the suit land ceased to exist after the rent sale on 22nd November An long before the mortgage sale on 24th November 1934 that the settlement of the suit land by the landlord with defendant 3 was a bona fide settlement and was not benami for defendant 1 that the subsequent transactions thereaft [...] His cause of action did not arise in July 1936 when he went to take possession it arose on the date of the lease to defendant 3. He was then put out of possession in consequence of the act of the landlord and of the new tenant defendant 3 inducted upon the land. ” [8] It is however argued that no point of special limitation was taken before the Court of appeal Below that no issue was framed upon it [...] So on the facts and circumstances of the case the conduct of J was not what was expected of a member of the profession to which be belonged. [...] Bhattacherjee has argued that as soon as the Hindu community of Gaibandha came to tear of the disposal of property by Kanakprova and her living in the house of Miajan, there was a great sensation in the town as a result of which the present petition under the Legal Practitioners Act was filed and his client was made a scape goat on mere suspi- cion.