The All India Reporter 1950 - Mysore Section with Parallel References to 51 Criminal Law Journal Citation: A.I.R. (37) 1950 Mysore

The following portion of what is quoted from this judgment is instructive: “Although no contractual obligation exists by which the Bombay company is compelled to purchase any of the manufactures of the American company the flow of business between the two companies secured by the fact that the ultimate and complete control of the Bom- bay-company is vested in the American company which owns all it [...] There can be no doubt that the obligations imposed upon the customers though not shown to be con- tractual have the effect of vesting the effective and ultimate control over the business in Mysore in the hands of the company for the purpose of securing the flow of business in Mysore. [...] 356 of 1942. 13 on the file of the High Court, both the decisions of the Munsiff and the Subordinate Judge were set aside and the pre- sent plaintiff was declared to be the owner of the suit schedule property. [...] 51 of 47-48 in the Court of the Munsiff, Bangalore, under the Mysore Guardian and Wards Act for the appointment of himself as the guardian of the person of his minor daughter, Lingamma, and for the custody of the minor. [...] The rule embodied in the section, no doubt, precludes the tenant from denying title at the time of the creation of the tenancy but admits of the qualification that subsequent to the creation of tenancy the tenant is not debarred from contending that the land.