The Law Reports. Under the Superintendence and Control of the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales Indian Appeals: Being Cases in the Privy Council on Appeal from the East Indies 1890-91

The question before the High Court was whether the transactions between the Plaintiff and the first Defendant were binding on the estate in the hands of the reversioners. [...] The judgment of the 10th of December 1888 dismissed the suit as to Rs.1 12 500 part of the Plaintiff's claim and decreed that accounts should be taken of all assets of the insolvent estate represented by the Plaintiff received by the Petitioner's China firm from the date of the insolvency and also various accounts of the dealings between the insolvent and the Petitioner's Bombay firm. [...] His finding upon the third issue therefore was that the tamliknama passed the share of Kuldip Naraiu in the joint estate to Biseswar Pershad and that that share in the absence of any particular allegation to the contrary might be presumed to have been half the entire estate at the date of the gift. [...] Provision is accordingly made for the maintenance on a fairly liberal scale of the young man and other provisions for the other members of the family ; and the bulk of the property after setting aside certain property dedicated to particular purposes was to pass wholly to Kuldip to the exclusion of the helpless young man Sadhoram. [...] But it does appear from the proceedings with reference to a subsequent change in the registration in consequence of the next document to which we are about to refer that some time after the execution of the deed of 1856 properties which had formerly stood on the register in the names of Kuldip and Sadhoram were registered in the name of Kuldip alone.