The Law Reports. Under the Superintendence and Control of the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales. Indian Appeals: Being Cases in the Privy Council on appeal from the East Indies 1889-90

It appears that on the 10th of April two days before the expiration of the period of two months the Appellant offered as security a bond by two parties of two sets of properties and on the 13th of April the pleader of the Respondent asked that the matter might stand over and that it should be referred to the Registrar to inquire whether the security was sufficient that being the day after the [...] On the 28th of April the Registrar submitted a report in which he stated that each of the two Sets of properties included in the security bond which had been executed on the 24th of March 1885 and registered on the 1st of April was of sufficient value but he sumitted for the judgment of the High Court questions of law which had been raised before him with regard to the power of the parties [...] In the present case this observation arises that in fact the Court did give an extension of time beyond the 12th of April and if the Appellant is right the proceedings by which the matter was referred to the report of the Registrar on the 13th on the application of the Respondent's pleader would be altogether nugatory and idle. [...] An appeal against this order or in the alternative against the order of the 14th of August 1880 was admitted by the High Court on the 15th of January 1885 and on the 26th of January 1886 the High Court pronounced its judgment affirming the order complained of and fully dismissing the suit. [...] It was written by the Assistant Collector to the Government pleader and the writer requested the Government pleader to take steps at once to inform the Court and intimate to the Mookhtar of the junior branch Bisestvar Moitra that the Court of Wards does not authorize the suit." That letter was comunicated to the Court.