cover image: The Law Reports. Under the Superintendence and Control of the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales. Indian Appeals: Being Cases in the Privy Council on Appeal from the East Indies  1895-96

Premium

20.500.12592/16789t

The Law Reports. Under the Superintendence and Control of the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales. Indian Appeals: Being Cases in the Privy Council on Appeal from the East Indies 1895-96

1896

Further on the Court found : " It is obvious that the transfer was not validated by the consent of all the persons having a right of expectancy in regard to Kashi Ram's estate on Setember 17 1863 and that the single member of the family who helped and assisted in the making of the transfer is not shewn by a title of evidence to have consented to any transfer beyond the life interest of the [...] The deed admitted in evidence for the plaintiff purported to be made by Nabbo and Gomti and to sell one-third share of the village Beghur Kanjaula with all the rights and interests pertaining thereto for Rs.1500 ; it stated that the vendors put the vendee in possession of the share sold instead of us like ourselves ; and that the vendee has become an absolute owner of the share sold from the da [...] The answer to the other part of the defence is that Jaikishan Das was no party to the compromise in June 1871 and that Meghraj's claiming on the death of Gomti the share of the property which she took under it is not inconsistent with the claim in this suit but the contrary. [...] In by far the great majority the direct reverse was the fact the inferior proprietors being the ancient and hereditary proprietors while the over-lord's conection with the estate was often a matter of very recent origin and due to the fact that the sub-proprietor in the troublous times of the last eighty years prior to British rule put theselves under the mgis of some powerful lord possess [...] Any one of the sons thing sonless the surviving sons shall be entitled to all the properties equally" :— Held that the period of distribution being the death of the testator the gift to the three sons was indefeasible at that date according to the true construction of s. 111 of Act X. of 1865 made applicable by the Hindu Wills Act of 1870 ; and that the widow of the eldest son who died sonle
law
Pages
186
Published in
United Kingdom
SARF Document ID
sarf.100079
Segment Pages Author Actions
Frontmatter
i-xii Frederick Pollock view
Cases in the Privy Council
1-168 Frederick Pollock view
Index
169-173 Frederick Pollock view
Backmatter
i-i Frederick Pollock view

Related Topics

All