cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes  Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts  December 18  1899

Premium

20.500.12592/d8q1j1

The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts December 18 1899

1899

How CIE REVIVAL OF THE MASTER’S OFFICE MAY go to relieve the Ciourt and reduce the accumulatitn Of work will appear from the following very practical suggestions in the Minims of the Englishman I --would suggest ill the Government thought it fit to make such an appointment that the Officer should also be directed to take up the -t-vork which is usually done by the Insolvent Commissioners. [...] The printer or publisher of the report is not the author of the speech reported which is the only thing which gives any value or interest to the report. [...] The attorney now claimed that the conduct of the Plaintiff and‘ the Defendant Luchmi Narain had been such as to cause a breach of the lien which he had for the costs due to him and he also alleged that the settlement was in fact not bond fide but collusive between the parties with the object of depriving him of his costs. [...] The Registrar reported that the marriamzettlement was for the benefit for the said infant; and his Lordship thereupon ordered that the said marriage settlement be made with the approbation of the High Court under sec. [...] Held—That the decree would not operate as res judicata first as the Plaintiffs do not claim under the Varadar who obtained the decree ; secondly as the decree was ex parte and was satisfied not by the Defenant but by a third person who was no reladen of the Defendapt and who the Defendant says was in occpation of the land and the Defendant repudiates all connection with him or with th
law
Pages
4
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts December 18 1899
xxv-xxviii unknown view

Related Topics

All