The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Courts Monday June 25 1906

In this connection it is desirable to invite the attention of his Lordship the Officiating Chief Justice and the learned Judges of the High Ceurt to the letter which appeared in the ninth volume of the Calcutta Weekly Notes at p 187 of the notes portion. [...] 189 and 203 of the Civil Procedure Code to the proceedings of the Cacutta Small Cause Court and also to amend the rule so that applications for revision of decrees and orders of the Small Cause Court which are at present presented to the Judges sitting on the Original Side of the High Court may be presented to the Appellate Side. [...] The question involved in the appeal was whether the Respondent was entitled to the full proprietary possession of two villages forming part of the Taluta of Gangol which were bestowed on her mother at the time of her marriage by way of shankalap by her mother's father Rajah Sitla Bakhsh Singh who was at the time the owner of the estate. [...] We the parties or our heirs shall have nothing to do with those villages or the income thereof but the lambers of the said villages shall be included in the number of the Gangol estate." The compromise was brought to the notice of the Court and Rajah Narpat Singh'sauit was disposed of in accordance with its terms under which he obtained possession of the Gangol estate from Rani Sukhraj Kintwa [...] " (3) How far are the parties bound by the terms of the deed of compromise in respect of the villages in suit and how does it affect the present claim." The SubOrdinate Judge held on the first issue that Rajah Sitla aklish Singh did as a matter of fact give the proprietary interest in the villages in suit to Rani Jagatpal Kunwar at the time of her marriage but that as a matter of lanw it wa