The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday August 2 1909

It appears that the other brothers had been married at the joint expense and that the bride prices in respect of their marriages had been paid from the joint funds and the arbitrators in consideration of this made the award that the Plaintiff be entitled to get his marriage expenses from the joint family funds. [...] 339 of the present Code and as the language itself is clear and free from ambiguity a Court of Justice cannot go bhind the language and enquire what was the previous state of the case law or the statutory law on the point. [...]." show that in order to establish the guilt of the approver it must be proved by the prosecution in the -trial that the approver has not complied with the condition on which tlastender was made. [...] The second accused Jogabandhu was a mohurir who was in charge of the records of the Court and it was found by the lower Court that Jagabandhu made over the records to the other accused Nanda Lal. [...] Held—That as under the term of the solenama the parties were given possession and the only thing that remained to be done was to execute patta and kabuliyat the compromise was inamissible in evidence for not being registered the land of which the Plaintiff was given possession being outside the scope of the suit.