cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes  Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts  Monday  February 14  1910

Premium

20.500.12592/w7dqr9

The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday February 14 1910

1910

The MASTER OF THE ROLLS in the course of his judgment dismissing the appeal said that it was not really open to the Court to decide the case diffeently from Mr. [...] He now applies to have the attacment released in his favour and he is entitled to have it so released because the order of the Colletor under the Act is a determination by a copetent Court of the rights of the persons entitled to the land. [...] It is also a determination of the rights of the parties to the original dispute since the two parties in the original dispute were also both before the Survey Court. [...] The Subordinate Judge who reversed the decision of the Munsif held that the tax had not been assessed on the proper valuation of the holding and that therefore the Plaintiff was entitled to a decree. [...] In decreeing a rent suit at the admitted rate it was incumbent on the Court to accept the amission of the tenant as a whole regard being had to the question whether the land in possession of the Defendant was the same as it was when the tenancy was created.
law
Pages
4
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday February 14 1910
81-84 unknown view

Related Topics

All