The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday June 5 1911

But a general onslaught on the whole of the English judiciary obviously because the Labour Party feel aggrieved over the Osborne judgment is to say the least thoroughly unjustified and quite unworthy of him both as a Minister of the Crown and a member of the House of Commons. [...] INCREASED FACILITIES FOR THE ELECTION OF lawyers in the Legislatures of the country would go also to increase the self-respect of the profession and to elevate its morals for the most efficient checks to the demoralisation of the Bar consist in the public esteem in which the profession is held which itself is largely measured by the importance that the State attaches to the Bar as a body. [...] 969 of 1910 in the High Court against the Petitioners and the Dfendants-Respondents for the administration of the estate of a deceased testator for construction of his Will for the appointment of a Receiver for accounts to be taken on the footing pf wilful neglect and default for costs against the said executors and for further and other reliefs. [...] The Plaintiffs-Respondents on the 23rd January 1911 obtained a rule nisi in the said suit calling upon the Petitioners and the Defendants-Rspondents to show cause why a Receiver should not...be appointed until the final determination of the suit or the further order of the Court to take charge of the estate of the said testator and why an injunction should not issue against the Defendants t [...] The District Judge held that the amalnama not having been registered could rot be received as evidence of any transation affecting the property ' and did not regard the evidence of payment of rent as sufficient to prove the Defendant's tenancy under Y. The Appellants attacked that decision of the District Judge in respect of the arnalnami.