The Calcutta Weekly Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday March 20 1922

659 F. B.) are the logical conclusions to which the doctrine that one reversioner does not derive title from another reversioner could be pushed; but having regerd to the outstanding fact of identity of interest on the part of the general body of reversioners near and remote in the preservation of the reversion the right to carry on a suit brought by a reversioner to impeach an alienatl'on by [...] The contesi between the parties related to the construction of the Arbitration Clause in a Contract for the sale of goods. [...] But at the time of the hearing of the appeal the Defendants took the objection that the Defendmt-Respondent No. [...] effect to the contention and held that in the absence of anything from which' the interests of the several Defendants can be discriminated the whole suit must be dismissed : Held—That the whole suit should not be dimissed. [...] The accused Manobilash moved the High Court on the ground that the order of revival was bad in law and neither the Sub-Divisional Magistrate nor the trying Magistrate could revive the proceeings.