The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the privy Council and Short Notes of Important Decisions of other High Courts in India Monday June 8 1931

In his trenchant book Professor Allen re-iterates the protest but he also goes on to point out that not only has the exective appropriated a large part of the funtions of the legislature but in Courts it adopts an attitude which the ProfeSsor calls “ the peculiar ferocity of the Crown as a litigant.” According to an old assumtion the State is an honest man. [...] The agents of the Crown it seems are for throwing over the convention that the State too is not above the law. [...] 435 and calling for it otherwise and if the District Magistrate is debarred from questioning any order of the Sessions Judge.in the first case he is eqUally debarred in the sCond.- The proper course for him is to apply to the local Government to file an appeal or apply to the I.egal Rmembrancer to move the High Court in revision as the case may be. [...] When a partner genuinely lends money beyond the initial capital to the partnership at an agreed reasonable rate of interest and the money is used for capital expenditure and the payment of interest is not in any way dependent on the earning of profits the interest paid by the partnernip to him must be deducted in computing the profits or gains of the partnership as provided by see. [...] Where the lands at the time of acquistion were under cultivation but the sitution of the land was such that it had a special adaptability for being used for builing purposes and the lands were valued by the Collector as agricultural lands: Held (TEK CHAND and CURRIE JJ.)— That the principle of valuation in case of aquisition of land under the Land Acquistion Act is that the owner