The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Noted of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and Short Notes of Important Decisions of other High Courts in India Monday November 21 1932

(5)1 out of order and in view of the protestations of the Law Member that it was never the intention of the Government to curtail powers conferred by Parliament added with delicate irony that if that was so it could not be beyond the drafting capacity of the Legal Department to prepare a proper draft and put the matter beyond doubt or ambguity. [...] Lord Chelmsford in his attempt to reform the Calcutta University by the appointment of the Sadler Commission had a mind to itroduce the Oxford system of co-operative teaching and research which would have rlieved the College and University staff as also the undergraduates and graduates of much of the burden and waste of time involved in the day-school system of teaching that prvails here [...] Though in one aspect the result is the same whether the rule is discharged or on the re-hearing the original decree be repeated in law there is a material difference; for in the latter case the whole matter having been re-opeed there is a fresh decree ; in the former case the parties are relegated to and still rest on the old decree. [...] The total of the liabilities falling to the share of the assessees was Rs. [...] It was found that (1) that the money for which the interest was due was the capital borrowed entirely for the pupose of the two dissolved businesses (2) that the money was borrowed from third parties and not from any of the assessees' businesses (3) that the borrowed capital was actually utilised in the said two busnesses (4) that on the dissolution of the two firms the assessees took ov