cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes  Monday  December 20  1943

Premium

20.500.12592/6fbxdx

The Calcutta Weekly Notes Monday December 20 1943

1943

In the present case two persons had been convicted of forgery and the Appelant had been convicted of abetting them in the commission of the offence. [...] In aid of the view taken of the suclause as applied to the facts of the case before them their Lordships say that an amendment in the persons alleged to have committed the offence abetted is only amenment and not charging a fresh offence. [...] The defence is concerned not so much with the amendment of the charge as such but with the consequential possibility prvided for in another part of the section which empowers the Appellate Court to alter the finding. [...] They say it could equally be sustained by treating the abetment found against the Appellant as abetment of an abetment that is to say an abetment of the abetment of which the other person had since been found guilty by the Appellate Court. [...] Athough the arrangement of the Companies Act has not been followed the sections and regulations of the Act have as far as posible been used as head-notes And the etent to which the various provisions of the Act have been the subject of judicial decsions is clearly and accurately indicated.
law
Pages
2
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes Monday December 20 1943
xiii-xiv unknown view

Related Topics

All