cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes  Reports of Important Decisions of the Calcutta High Court & Dacca High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on Appeal from India  November to October  1949-1950

Premium

20.500.12592/wmwpcg

The Calcutta Weekly Notes Reports of Important Decisions of the Calcutta High Court & Dacca High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on Appeal from India November to October 1949-1950

1950

The argument for the Appellant regards all coals despatched by rail the was that the sole purpose of the words " at rates of royalty which were originally due the said reduced freight" in the preceding under the annas and 1 anna 6 sentence is to differentiate that sentence pies—had ceased to operate and rates of 5 from the last sentence in the clause. [...] lessee the Respondent and his agents were unaware of their right under the lease; that This section makes no distinction bethis was not a mistake of fact but was a ween mistakes of fact and mistakes of law mistake of law ; that the law of India in but it must of course be read together with this matter is the same as the law of Enthe rest of the Act and in particular with land and that un [...] Where inadmissible evidence was amitted which (night well have affected the mind of the jury the High Court directed a fresh trial after ruling out the said evi-: (fence on the ground that the jury would be more familiar with conditions existing in an Indian village at the time of the occurence than the Judges of the High Court. [...] Sudhansu Mukherjee on behalf of married woman named Mentu Dassi the the Appellant has contended that the vedaughter of the complainant Jatil Mehna diet of the jury is vitiated by reason of the from the house of Jatil Mehna in village admission of inadmissible evidence The Harirampur. [...] 156 of the Indian Evidence Act to MIn order to corroborate the testimony of a Peach witness any formes statement made by such each the credit of the persi in making the witness relating to the same fact at or about the same it cannot he used to corroborate the time when the fact took place or before any witness under sec.
law
Pages
1011
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
Cover
i-iii unknown view
Frontmatter
i-ii unknown view
The Calcutta Weekly Notes
1-978 unknown view
Backmatter
i-ii unknown view

Related Topics

All