cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes  January 19  1953

Premium

20.500.12592/cw72jx

The Calcutta Weekly Notes January 19 1953

1953

The oject of the paper was to urge that in eercising power jiven to them by Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitiltion the Supreme Court and the High Courts should lot confine then sch within the range or follow the procedure of English Courts in the matter. [...] But our Supreme Court &rid the High Courts should folow without technical hair-splitting the broad formulation by Lord Sumner when he says That supervision goes to two points : one is the area of the inferor jurisdiction and the qualifications and conditions of its exercise; the other is the observance of the law in the course of its exercise" (12) (1922) 2 A. C. 128 (156). [...] the face of the proceedings or any Irregularity in the proceedings adopted by the Labour Commissioner which goes contrary to the principles of natural 'justice." It is not likely that the Supreme Court was referring to noexistence of error of lay. [...] In the course of the judgment the Supreme Court touched on the question of the exact scope and extent of the jrisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 but sound it unnecessary to Consider and decide it ;-or the disposal of the appeal before it. [...] What is prohibited in the case of a surrender is a division of the estate between the widow and the surrenderee not any division of the property surendered as between the surrenderee and others say between the nearest and the prospective reversioners.
law
Pages
11
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes January 19 1953
xxxiii-ii unknown view

Related Topics

All