cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday  January 18  1904

Premium

20.500.12592/t80xwk

The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday January 18 1904

1904

The Munsif remitted the award to the arbitrator for determination of the other matters originally referred to him ; the arbitrator however refused to act further in the matter and the Munsif himself took up the case and decided it-in favour of the Plaintiff. [...] On appeal the Subordinate Judge held that the award made by the arbitrator was sufficient for the determination of the case and reversed the decision of the Munsif and gave the Defendants a deciee in terms of the award. [...] It has been held that as the Plaintiffs and the Defendants claimed under one and the same landlord and the question between them being which of the two had the better title to the laud in dispute the case could not have been concluded by the finding of the arbitrator upon the question of possession and that the Munsif had acted rightly on the arbitrator declining to complete the award in dec [...] That the Defendant know or ought to have known that the certificate he gave to enable the obtaining of the order from the justice for removal of the child was untrue. [...] The order was delivered as follows by LORD MACNAGHTEN.—Their Lordships are of opnion that the orders of His Majesty in Council of the 7th August 1900 were intended to uphold the decrees of the first Court and to decide that the sum due to the Petitioners at the date of His Majesty's orders was the balance of Rs.
law
Pages
8
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday January 18 1904
lxv-lxxii unknown view

Related Topics

All