The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday February 1 1904

Next year he headed the list in the B. L. Examintion ansl was enrolled as a vakeel of the Calcutta High Court in the same year ; but on getting an offer of the post of Law Lecturer of the Berhapur College with permission to practise in the local Courts he accepted the offer and went to Berhampur to join the District Bar. [...] It has been held by Oldfiold J. that the reference of the case to J was not made under or governed by the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code relating to arbitration and therfore the Defendants are competent to revoke the agreement and that assuming the reference was made under the provisions of the Oaths Act (X of '1873) there was no. [...] On a judicial inquiry the Deputy Magistrate came to the same conclusion and gave sanction generally to the accused to prosecute the Petitioner : field that the sanction given for the prosecution of the Pettioner under sec. [...] Per Bhashyam Ayyangar J. that it is not merely the gain resulting to the principal debtor from the act of the surety but the loss which the surety has sustained by the default of the principal debtor which entitles the surety to sue the principal debt 1' for recovery of the ;Iniount by way of contribution." In Uunnaiyan v. Kamahchi at p. 339 the effects of the enfranchisement of a service [...]. The Court as above constituted held that the defence was right the words used by prisoner was only his emphatic way of saying not guilty and therefore by itself was not sufficient to bring the case within the above section namely that the nature or conduct of the defence was such as to involve imputations on the character of the proscutor or his witnesses.