The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday February 8 1904

However we do not object to such explanations of the Government view of the matter in so far as they are intended for the guidance of the members of the Council or for the information of the general public. [...] The presence of rpresentatives of the Government of India makes the paramount power in the Native States pratically place the entire control of affairs in the hands of such representatives. [...] In Ba labai v. Ganes/t at p. 162 it was held by the majority that a Court after it had placed on the record the name of a person as the legal representative of the deceased Plaintiff could not thereafter on the objection of the Defendant go into the question of the right of the substituted Plaintiff to represent the dceased and to dismiss the suits on the finding that she had no such righ [...] the date of the wrongful denial by the Defendant in each case of the Plaintiff's title and the procuring of the attachment. [...] In a lengthy judgment after considering the suggested scheme and the result to the various ()lasses of holder of the stock the learned Judge said that after making every allowance for the views which business men would be likely to take of their own affairs and looking at the matter benevolently he could not think that the scheme was fair to the holders of the preferred ordinary stock.