cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes  Monday  June 6  1904

Premium

20.500.12592/2s52x3

The Calcutta Weekly Notes Monday June 6 1904

1904

In this last case one of the Judges (Willis J.) questioned the correctness of the decision in Cowie v. Rentfry and indeed went so far as to say that the decision of the Supreme Court of Bengal which the Privy Council had reversed was the correct decision. [...] The broker gave evidence that after he had sent the bought and sold notes to the respective parties the seller objected to a certain ex pression in the note sent to him and returned it to the broker who took it to the buyer and the buyer crossed cut the word objected to mat king the alteration with his initials. [...] The plaintiff objected to the validity of the award on the ground that all the parties to the suit had not joined in referring the suit to arbitration ; the ojection was dismissed and judgment given in acordance with the award. [...] The test of the right is I think whether the obstruction complained of is a nuisance and as it appears to me the value of the test makes the amount of right acquired depend upon the surroundings and cir cumstances of light coming from other sources as well as the question of the proximity of the prmises complained of. [...] The restrictive covnant the area being extended to the whole world was not necessary for the protection of a business which was not large the great majority of the customers being in the south of England.
law
Pages
8
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes Monday June 6 1904
ccxxix-ccxxxvi unknown view

Related Topics

All