cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday  April 27  1914

Premium

20.500.12592/bd5gkj

The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday April 27 1914

1914

The absence of a definition of an “ accused” in the Code has very often presented many difficuties and raised complications especially on account of the fact that the Code of Criminal Procedure not merely provides for the procedure of trials for offences but deals with the prevention of crime and other incidental matters necessary for the maintainance of peace and order. [...] The L-gislature now provides that in such cases of difference of opinion the matter will be re-heard before a Bench consisting of the first two Judges with h the addition of a third Judge and the opinion of the majority will be the judment of the Court. [...] (561A) to the effect that nothing in the Code shall be deemed to limit or affect the iherent power of the Court to make such orders as may be necessary to give effect to any order under the Code and to prevent abuse of the process of the Court. [...] The Plaintiff was the gomasta of the landlord of the village. [...] In a previous rent suit brought by the Plaintiff against the Defendanr the Defendant pleaded that he always paid his rent to the Plaintiff for the benefit of the landlord and that the Plaintiff was nothing more than a gomasta and he was a raiyat holding directly under the landlord.
law
Pages
4
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday April 27 1914
cxxxvii-cxl unknown view

Related Topics

All