The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday July 7 1919

The acceptance of this view at the committee stage of the Bill in the House of Commons indicates that the official tendency in favour of the curtailment of right of audience of counsel is henceforth not likely to meet much encouragement front the House. [...] Whilst the Menshevik shrinks before the appalling tragedy of civil war the Bolshevik stands for the merciless destruction of the bourgeoisie by means of a dictatorship of the proletariat and for the international Boshevik revolution. [...] Was the Dewan merely the Receiver-General of the Province or was he vested with executive powers to ensureb the collection of the revenue for which he and not the Nazim was responsible to the emperor? [...] So far as anything could be definite in those chaning times it would appear that the collection of the revenue was in the hands of the zemindars but that the ensuring of or the enforcement for the payment by the latter was in the hands of the Dewan. [...] 1 but that would not affect the decree against the remaiit g Defendants : Held—That the decision of the learned Judge of the lower Appellate Court was correict but die was in error in considering that the Plaintiff was in contempt in instituting the suit without the previous sanction of the Judge having the carrage of the proceedings in which the Receiver had been appointed.