cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday  August 6  1934

Premium

20.500.12592/q61r9t

The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday August 6 1934

1934

Neither of the suclauses of the section entitle the jury to arrogate to themselves the power of critcising the professional conduct of Counsel or to air their views on matters which are not before the Court or to give a certificate of good character to a class of public sevants whose conduct as a class is not an issue in the case. [...] The long hitory of the institution of the jury in Holdworth's History of English Law does not mention one instance in which any verdict of the nature of that in the present case was rendered. [...] The clauses in the partnership deed fixing the period of partnership to sixty years and restricting the right of alienation had not the effect of constituting an agrement to the contrary that the partnership should he continued after the death of one of the partners. [...] (2) That limitation began to run from the date of the dissolution that is the date of death of one of the partners. [...] 54 of the Provincial Insolvency Act is the date on which the transfer sought to be set aside bcomes effective in law namely in the case of a transfer mortgage or sale the registrtion of the deed.
law
Pages
4
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday August 6 1934
cliii-clvi unknown view

Related Topics

All