cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday  May 22  1939

Premium

20.500.12592/0wmj6w

The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday May 22 1939

1939

The choice of the Provinces fell upon the Advocates-General of Bengal and Madras who were then granted leave by the Court to adduce further argument in support of the case of the Government of the Central Prvinces and Berar. [...] not the first sale by the manufacturer in the process of the transit_ from him to the ultimate consumer which might be to a retail dealer but the sale by which the goods passed to the consumer hi:self for his own consumption. [...] The power given to the Provincial Legislature in the concurrent field is cut down by the exclusive power granted to the federal legislature and finally the exclusive power given to the Provincial legislature to legislate in its own field under List H is conditioned by the exclusive power graned to the federal legislature with regard to List I and the concurrent power under List III. [...] 3 of the Usurious Loans Act in cases in which the circumstances proed admit of the existence of a discretion and is opposed to the express provision of the law laid down in the Usury Laws Repeal Act in cases to which the Usurious Loans Act does not apply.; That being so sec 11 is repugnant to an existing Indian law and is to the extent of the repugnancy void. [...] The question was whether the decree was executable : Held (VENKATASUEBA RA0 and ABDUR RAHMAN JJ.)—That the decree was satified to the extent of the one-fourth share of the Plaintiff but remained executable to the extent of the threfourth share of the Dfendants Nos.
law
Pages
4
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes. Monday May 22 1939
cv-cviii unknown view

Related Topics

All