Calcutta Criminal Rulings. Being a reprint of the Reports of Criminal Cases from the Calcutta Weekly Notes 1932

arrested on a civil process the moment the Court he has been attending rises for the day or that the slightest deviation for the purpose of (business or refresment robs the party of the protection of the section. [...] Mien the offetime has been consmitted within the jurisdiction of the Sessions Court Of Howrah the commiment if any from the Central Children Court must be to the Howrah Sessions Court and not to the High Court SeeLAKEIT SAIIU (HANU) v. EMPEROR ``IN see. [...] XVIII.] When a conviction is vet aside on the ground that the Magistrate had no jurisdiction to try the offence charged which was triable by the Court of Sessions the Magistrate cannot therafter commit the accused to the Court of dessiokla forthwith (without an equiry under Chapter XVIII of the Crminal Procedure Code. [...] When the defence sets up no spetide case but is limited to a denial of the charge coupled with destructive criticisn of the prosecution evidence the defence ease is properly and suffteiently placed before the jury if attention is drawn to the discrepancies in the prosecution evdence and the criticism to which such evdence has been subjected. [...] 20 was set aside on the ground that the Magistrate had no jurisdiction to try the charge under that section and the accused was directed to be set at liberty (with the dhservatiot that the Magistrate might commit him to the Court of Sessions if he desired to proceed further in the matter.