cover image: Government of Bengal. Board of Revenue. Collection of Important Judgments of the Board of Revenue Bengal. 1928-1945

Premium

20.500.12592/cgrb4p

Government of Bengal. Board of Revenue. Collection of Important Judgments of the Board of Revenue Bengal. 1928-1945

1948

On appeal the Board held that the principle adopted was wrong and ordered that no account would be taken of the lands of the—when distributing the assets of the estate under partition but the lands and the revenue of the—would be amalgamated in the new estates which resulted from the partition. [...] There was also a clear condition in the deed of gift that the donors would pay the revenue and that if the properties were put to sale for arrears of revenue and if as a result of these sales the interest of the donees was annulled the donors would give compensation to the donees. [...] 6. Rejection— Of an appeal filed by a co-sharer against the sale of an estate is not a bar to the Commissioner's recommending the annulment of the sale of the estate on the ground of hardship under section 26 of Act XI of 1859 at the instance of other co-sharers. [...] On.appeal the Board held that the essence of an—is that there must be a clear acceptance of potential liability by the giver of the bond and that the Board did not read into the endorsement that the father was prepared to accept any liability in respect of the transfer. [...] 214 of 1928 filed on 9th November 1928 on behalf of Narendra Nath Chaudhury against the order of the Commisioner of the Burdwan Division dated the 3rd October 1928 upholding that of the Collector of Burdwan dated the 8th August 1928 rejecting the appellant's application for the separation of the lands of the estate No.
government politics public policy
Pages
87
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100207
Segment Pages Author Actions
Frontmatter
i-vii unknown view
Government of Bengal. Board of Revenue. Collection of Important Judgments of the Board of Revenue Bengal. 1928-1945
1-78 unknown view