cover image: The New Review  July 1935

Premium

20.500.12592/vjb7zs

The New Review July 1935

1935

The famous 'dispute between the Ancients and the Moderns' was the main centre of interest during the last two decades of the seventeenth century. [...] The authority of these courts was questioned by the judges of the Supreme Court who were full of pride in the benignity of the English common law and contempt for the laws prevailing in India. [...] No less important for the security of the Rule of Law is the separation of the Judiciary from the Executive. [...] 'ButTHE RULE OF LAW IN INDIA 17 rules and regulations which are enforced by the Executive in opposition to the decision of the legislature and against the liberty of the subject are derogatory to the Ruleof Law. [...] But what will the attitude of the ordinary British subject towards the new ministers be under the Responsible Government which will inherit the judicial and legal structure from the present bureaucracy ? Will the subordination of the Judiciary to the Executive and the continuation of the repressive laws in the Statute Book be conducive to the development of a benevolent Government ? There are two
history
Pages
114
Published in
United Kingdom
SARF Document ID
sarf.120030
Segment Pages Author Actions
Frontmatter
i-viii M. S.J. Ledrus view
Culture and Common Sense
1-7 Cyril Bernard view
The Rule of Law in India
8-20 William Coelho view
After the Roosevelt Honeymoon
21-29 Joseph Thorning view
Co-Education for India ?
30-41 T.N. Siqueira view
Gregor Mendel
42-48 James Walsh view
Jehanne
49-58 H.C.E. Zacharias view
The Educational Activities of the League of Nations
59-63 Nikhil Das Gupta view
Rambles in Anglo-Indian Literature
64-71 Sadhan Ghosh view
The Eternal Brahmanhood
72-78 Michael Ledrus view
Notes and Comments
79-84 unknown view
Some Recent
85-104 unknown view

Related Topics

All