cover image: The Law Reports. indian Appeals: Being Cases in the Privy Council on appeal from the East Indies- 1909-1910

Premium

20.500.12592/mq8qcp

The Law Reports. indian Appeals: Being Cases in the Privy Council on appeal from the East Indies- 1909-1910

1910

93 Seth Kanhaya Lal v.°National Imdad Ahmad v. Pateshri PaBank of India. 80 tap Narain Singh. 60 Sheoraj Kunwar v. Harihar Bakhsh Singh. 124 Lala Bhagwat Sahai v. Bepin Behari Mitter. 198 tidai Raj Singh v. Bhagwan Lal Kunwar v. Chiranji Lal. 1 Baksh Singh. 46TABLE OF CASES CITED. [...] The plaintiff alleges that the brothers Tej Ram and Brij Lal were separated in ownership of this property and as the adopted son of Brij Lal he claims to recover the whole of the property mentioned in the plaint or in the alternative if their ownership is joint to recover one half of that property. [...] The admission above mentioned of the lady that they were in her sitting-room was extracted from her on cross-examination by the pleader for Tej Ram her opponent the man who is sworn by Ram Lal to have been present at the ceremony and to have signed the entry in the book recording the adoption. [...] According to Ram Lal himself 125 members of the brotherhood and 100 or 150 others were collected together in this little village of Jatari ; yet none of the inhabitants of the village were produced on behalf of the plaintiff to prove that such a gathering ever took place while if the story of the numerous witnesses resident in the village and its vicinity examined for the defendants be true [...] Much discussion was devoted before their Lordships as well as in the Indian Courts to petty discrepancies between the evidence of the different witnesses examined for the plaintiff for instance as to which of three pundits alleged to have been present at the ceremony of adotion presided and which assisted or as to whether the ceremony and the receipt of the presents were recorded in two bo
law
Pages
241
Published in
United Kingdom
SARF Document ID
sarf.140614
Segment Pages Author Actions
Frontmatter
i-xiv Frederick Pollock, A Stone view
On Appeal From The High Court at Allahabad
1-11 unknown view
On Appeal From the Court of the Judicial Commissioner of Oudh
12-19 unknown view
On Appeal From the Chief Court of Lower Burma
19-27 unknown view
On Appeal From the High Court in Bengal
27-39 unknown view
On Appeal From the High Court at Allahabad
39-45 unknown view
On Appeal From the Court of the Judicial Commissioner of Oudh
46-60 unknown view
On Appeal From the High Court at Allahabad
60-70 unknown view
Os Appeal From the High Court at Allahabad
70-77 unknown view
On Appeal From the Court of the Judicial Commissioner of Oudh
77-80 unknown view
On Appeal From the Chief Court of the Punjab
80-86 unknown view
On Appeal From the Chief Court of the Punjab
86-93 unknown view
On Appeal From the High Court at Allahabad
93-104 unknown view
On Appeal From the Court of the Judicial Commissioner of Oudh
105-110 unknown view
On Appeal From the High Court at Madras
110-123 unknown view
On Appeal From the Court of the Judicial Commissioner of Oudh
124-133 unknown view
On Appeal From the Chief Court of Lower Burma
133-135 unknown view
On Appeal From the High Court in Bengal
136-146 unknown view
On Appeal From the High Court in Bengal
147-151 unknown view
On Appeal From the High Court at Allahabad
152-160 unknown view
On Appeal From the Court of the Judicial Commissioner of oudh
161-168 unknown view
On Appeal from the Court of the Judicial Commissioner of Oudh Luckno
168-182 unknown view
On Appeal From the High Court at Allahabad
182-190 unknown view
On Appeal From the Court of the Judicial Commissioner of Oudh
191-197 unknown view
On Appeal From the High Court in Bengal
198-206 unknown view
Index
207-214 unknown view

Related Topics

All