The Law of Land Acquisition in British India Being A Full Commentary on The Land Acquitision Act (Act No I of 1894) and All Other Miscellaneous Enactments Dealing with the same Subject

Arumugam v. Sivagana 12F Ashtonvale IronCompany v. Bristol Corporation. Askew v. Woodhead. 145.141 Assalinsky Countess v. Manchester Corporation. 85 86. [...] v. Sprot. „ „ v. Turcan. „. „ v. Walkers trustees. Campbell v. Wardlew Cant's Estate In re. Cardwell v. Midland Railway Co. [...] v. Saint Ma oolnoth. 87 98 Clark in re. 118 Clarke v. London School Board. 17 Coate v. Caledonian Railway Company. 35 Collector of Belgaum v. Bhiirao. 4 11 65 66 130 If „ Dfhagepore v. Girja Nath Ray 102 103 Is i. Hooghly v. Raj Kristo Mookerjee OP 68 82 ft „ Kaladji v. apa. 89 ft „ Poona v. u a 13 14. [...]. 137 „ Liverpool exparte. 139 Corry v. Great Western Railway. !66 Countess Assalinsky v. Manchester Corporation 85 88 89 Coverdale v. Charlton. 90 226 Cowper Essex v. The Local Board for Acton. 101 104 105 Cresswell v. Haines. 145 Croft v. Loidon North Western Rly. [...]. 32 98 109 Crown Brewery Mussoorie v. Collecto; of Dehra Dun 39 52 Cruttwell v. Lye '. 101 D Dartford Rural'District Council v. Bexley Heath Railway. 260 De Beauvoir In re. 139 144 Debenham and others v. King's College Cambridge. 117 Dhanjibhoy Bomanji In re. 69 72 73 79 86 91 92 Dinendra Narain Roy v. Tituram Mukerjee 122 123 124 Dodd's EItate./n re. a 139 1