On the Interpretation of Indian Statutes Based on Indian Case Law

15 Collector of Pubna v. Romtiath Tagore 389 Collector of Thana v. Krishnnath Gobind 79 Collector of Trichinopoly v. Lekamani - 19 71 399 Collector of Tichinopoly v. Lukkaman i 19 71 399 Colonial Bank of Australia v. Willan 126 438 Commissioners of Income Tax v. Pemsel Companhia. [...] 33 Lawrence v. Great Northern Railway Company 315 Lawrence v. King 326 Laycock v. Pickles 239 Leader v. Moxon 313 Leake v. Daniel 353 368 Le Bret v. Papillon 355 Ledgard v. Bull 437 Leelanund Sing v. Musst. [...] 70 v. Ayya Kunun Muduli 34 v. Bakuji Dayaram 84 v. Bal Gangadhar Tilak 46 v. Balkrishna Vithal 202 v. Baradapr a Chetti... [...] 8o Rajib Panda v. Lakhan Sendh Mahapatra 111 119 228 f 11 11 >I 11 v. 11 v. >1 v. v. v. 11 v. V. V. V. V. V. V. V. >> V. V. 11 V. V. tf V. V. „ V. Queen v. TABLE Or CASES. [...] v. Ram Chund Dutt 333 Webbe v. Lester 333 Wcbbe v. Macpherson 400 Weir Ex parte 410 Welton v. S tffery 206 West v. Downman 432 White v. Morley—see " Addtions." Wife (A) Petitioner v. (B) Husband...