cover image: Legislative Assembly Debates. Wednesday  16th November  1932. Official Report

Premium

20.500.12592/q35hj8

Legislative Assembly Debates. Wednesday 16th November 1932. Official Report

1932

W. Gaskell and the Central Board of Revenue on the proposal regarding the introduction of the re-organisation scheme in the United Provinces? [...] (f) Did the Income-tax Commissioner consult any of the officers of the Department in the United Provinces with regard to the scheme? [...] (h) Is it a fact that the Central Board of Revenue finding that no officer of the Department in the United Provinces was agreeable to the scheme abolished the post of the Income-tax Commissioner of the United Provinces and put the province in the hands of the Income-tax Commisioner of the neighbouring province viz. [...] Bhuput Shig (on behalf of Lala lIameshwar Prasad Bagla): (a) Will Government please state the reasons for introducing the rorganisation scheme in the Income-tax Department of the United Provinces against the well-considered opinion of successive Commissioners and the Association of the Assistant Commissioners and Income-tax Officers of the United Provinces? [...] If any specific cases of inordinate delay are brought to the notice of the Central Board of Revenue they will investigate the cause of the delays and take steps to prevent such delays recurring if possible (d) All draft references to the 11)&1 Court are submitted to the Central Board of Revenue who advise the Cornmis&oners on the legal points involved and the manner of their presentation.
government politics public policy
Pages
99
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100003
Segment Pages Author Actions
Frontmatter
i-i unknown view
Legislative Assembly Debates. Wednesday 16th November 1932
2133-2230 unknown view