Legislative Assembly Debates Monday 13th March 1933 Official Report

C. C. Biswas: (a) Is it a fact that in 1925 the Mvernment of India suggested to the Government of Bengal that they would be prepared to extend the provisions of the Provident Funds Act to the Provident Fund established by the Calcutta University for its employees if the Act incorporating the said University was amended so as to include a provision enabling the Governor General in Council to take [...] Is it not coinpetent now to the Government of India by the issue of a notification under sub-section (3) of section 8 of the present Provident Funds Act to extend the benefits of that Act to the Provident Fund of that University? [...] Uppi Saheb Babadur: (a) Will Government be pleased to state whether the Director-General of Posts and Telegraphs ordered the withholding of payment of the arrears due to the Reserve Clerks for the period between the dates of failure of such Reserve Clerks to pass the confirmation examination and the date of their passing subsequently? [...] The question of the application of the revised rules to the case of reserve clerks with reference to the dates of their cofirmation is still the subject of correspondence between the Director General and the audit authorities and is expected to be settled shortly. [...] B. Das: (a) With reference to the recent confirmation of the superior officers' cadre of the Electric Traction of the Great Indian Peninsula Railway will Government pleas3 state why it was considered necessary to permanently retain as many as twelve posts of officers in view of the fact that prior to electrification the technical work of the Bombay Division to which Division the activities of the