The Indian Law Reports Allahabad Series Containing Cases Determined by the High Court at Allahabad and by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on Appeal from that Court and from the Court of the Judicial Commissioner of Oudh 1901

Runehordas v. Parvatiloai, I. L. R. , 23 Rom. , 725 ,,, . , 451, 380 350 192 169 30 453 S. Salima Bibi v. Sheikh Muhammad, I. L. It. , 18 All. , 131 Sankaravadivammal a. K,marasainya, 1. L. R. , 8 Mad. , 473 Sasti Churn Nandi v. Aunopurna, 1. L. R. , 23 Cale. , 699 Shankar v. Mukta, I. L. R. , 22 Boni. , 513 „. v. Vithal, I. L. R. , 21 Born. , 45 . [...] Serhmal v. Hukam Singh, I. L. R. , 20 All. , 100 . Seth Chand Mal v. Durga Dei, I. L. R. , 12 All. , 313 . , Sharf-ud-din Khan v. Fatehyab Khan, I. L. R. , 20 All. , 208 Sheo Charan Lal v. Sheo Sewak Singh, I. L. R. , 18 All. , 469 Sheo Narain Rai v. Parmeshar Rai, I. L. R. ,18 All. , 270 Shitab Dei v. Ajudhia Prasad, I. L. R. , 10 All. , 13 Sital Prasad v. Imam Baklish, Weekly Notes, 1883, p. 47 Sitha [...] Held that none of the four coolies travelling in the van where the 10 thans of stolen cloth were found could be convicted of tte theft of the cloth in the absence of evidence to connect one or more of them individually with the possession of the cloth. [...] _Bhagcant rao v. Ganpatrao, I. L. R. , 16 Boni. , 267; Dholidas Ishvar v. Fulchand Chhagan, I. L. R. , 22 Bom. , 658, and Visvanathan v. Salinathan, I. L. R. , 13 Mad. , 83. [...] It was not for the benefit of the estate, and there was nothing to show that the question of benefit to the appellant or his estate had been considered in the allotment of the villages to the respo'ndents, for which the only apparent ground was the ultra vires award.