cover image: The Weekly Reporter  Appellate High Court  Containing Decisions of the Appellate High Court in All its Branches - Viz.  in Civil  Revenue and Criminal Cases  as Well as in Cases Referred by the Mofussil Small Cause Courts and the Recorders’ Courts; Together with Letters in Criminal Cases  and the Civil and Criminal Circular Orders Issued by the High Court; Also Decisions of H.M.’s Privy Council in Cases Heard in Appeal from Courts of British India

Premium

20.500.12592/6qznfd

The Weekly Reporter Appellate High Court Containing Decisions of the Appellate High Court in All its Branches - Viz. in Civil Revenue and Criminal Cases as Well as in Cases Referred by the Mofussil Small Cause Courts and the Recorders’ Courts; Together with Letters in Criminal Cases and the Civil and Criminal Circular Orders Issued by the High Court; Also Decisions of H.M.’s Privy Council in Cases Heard in Appeal from Courts of British India

1897

Where a purchaser from one of seve- ral shareholders of a joint property sues for the share of his vendor, but for the sake of valuing the case represents that his claim is for that quantity of land which by a division of it would fall to his share, and obtains a decree, the decree is only for joint possession . 187 (6) The mere fact of one of -several co- sharers alienating his share of the [...] 156 The deposition by a came of the vend- or's admission to him of a sale and receipt of consideration, together with the conduct and statements of the parties, form legal — of the sale as against the vendors . [...] 173 (to) Where two daughters of a judgment- debtor intervene to claim certain property sued for by the decree- holder, and one of the two dies during the pendency of the suit, the heir of the deceased cannot be held responsible for the default of the survivor to produce— . [...] holder, may recover 85 (3) With reference to two inconsistent findings of the late Sudder Court in two suits, one declaring the sale of the rights of the defendants' husbands to be valid, and the other invalid—Held by a majority of the Court that, as in the earlier of the above suits the rights of the ladies were under determination,. [...] (1o) In a suit by a widow of one of the members of a joint family of Our- ohits, for her share of the fees ob- tained by them 222 (it) W here a cause of action cognizable by the Principal Sadder A rneen was split into two suits and tried by the Suddcr A menu, and then heard in appeal by the Judge, it washeld that, as the appeal would eyNly have lain to the judge whether the case was originally tr
law
Pages
829
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100077
Segment Pages Author Actions
Cover
i-i D. Sutherland view
Frontmatter
i-lxvi D. Sutherland view
The Weekly Reporter Appellate High Court
1-297 D. Sutherland view
Rulings of the High Court Under Act X. of 1859
1-95 D. Sutherland view
Miscellaneous Appeals
1-58 D. Sutherland view
Rulings of the High Court in Criminal Cases
1-98 D. Sutherland view
Criminal Letters
1-10 D. Sutherland view
Civil Circular Orders of the High Court
1-11 D. Sutherland view
Criminal Circular Orders of the High Court
1-2 D. Sutherland view
Small Cause Court References
1-24 D. Sutherland view
Rulings on Recorders’ References
1-2 D. Sutherland view
References by Waste Land Courts
1-2 D. Sutherland view
Rules of Practice of the High Court
1-18 D. Sutherland view
Letters Patent
1-12 D. Sutherland view
In the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
1-133 D. Sutherland view

Related Topics

All