The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts May 7 1900

The question in the case was whether a purchaser of a property subject to a mortgue and who was not made a party to the mortgage hit although the mortgagor was aware of the purchase is entitled to bring a suit for confirmation of possession against the purchaser in execution of the mortgage decree ; and it was decided that such a suit was not maintainable and that the only right which he had acq [...] The question in the latter case was whether a purchaser of the equity of redemption whose purchase was also prior to the mortgage suit and who was no party to it was entitled to bring a suit for recovery of possession against the purchaser in execution of the mortgage decree. [...] For in the mortgage suit the purchaser of the equity of redemption or of the prperty subject to the mortgage should have been added as a party in the first instance. [...] They were there by the terms of the deed to do the work of the syndicate that is to say to cheat the shareholders and this forsooth is to be treated as a disclosure to the company when they were really there to hoodwink the sharholders and so far from protecting them were to obtain from them the money the produce of their nefarious plans. [...] The learned Jude then considered the more difficult question as to whether Earl Cowley is entitled to obtain an injunction to restrain his late wife ; the legal questions now raised do not depend on the cause which led to the dissolution of the marriage of the parties ; the reason given by the Lady ftir wishing to retain the same may as her son AVIS curious. because during the father's lifetime t