The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday January 21 1901

The judgment by virtue of which it was said that the present suit was barred had been passed in a sUit in which the Plaintiff claimed in the first place the winding up of the partnership business the Defendant being regarded as a co-partner in the business which was being managed by him ; in the second place for an account being taken from the Defendant he being regarded' as the managing p [...] Sixth.—What other relief is the Plaintiff entitled to ? Seventh.—Is the snit barred by limitation ? The Subordinate Judge held that the Plaintiff and Defendant were not partners and that the Defendant could not be sued in the capacity of a partner and he therefore dismissed the suit; the conclusion of the trial the Plaintiff asked tat an account might be decreed against the Defendant he being tre [...] That one of the terms of the ijara lease was that out of the rent payable by the ijardars to the lessor the former should pay the Government revnue on account of the lessor's share in the zemindari and.apparqptly it was with reference to this codition in the ijara pottah that the payment in April 1897 was made by the Plaintiff. [...] at for enhanced jama of the lands held by him under the Plaintiff; that the Defendant then executed the iv/nth:pa in suit in her favour on the 16th Kartick 1301 B. S. and promised to register the same after payment of the compensation which was to be paid after the paddy was reaped ; that the Defendant not having registered the haladiyar at the appointed time she presented it for registration a [...] The appliction which was based on the ground of fraud deceit coercion and failure to carry out the terms of the compromise was admitted on the ground that both parties misunderstood the terms and meaning of the Solenamd and ultimately the compromise decree was set aside and the appeal reheard the result being that the decree of the first Court was reversed and the suit disMissed.