cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes  Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts  Monday  August 19  1901

Premium

20.500.12592/pd2n2p

The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday August 19 1901

1901

On the 23rd of March 1891 the Appellants and the Respondents entered into an agreement for the sale of the said estate by the Respondents to the Appellants for the sum of Rs. [...] I am giving instructions to my Superintendent for the carrying on of the estate work and write to request you or your people not to interfere with the property." On the same date the Appellants wrote to the Respondents maintaining that the conveyance which they had forwarded for execution and which the Respondents had retained corrytly carried out the terms of the said agreement and asking that [...] In the plaint in such suit the present Respondents after reciting the said agreement of the 23rd March 1891 and their contention that the present Appellants had failed to carry out the terms of the said agrement stated that on the 11th of September 1891 they had written the letter of that date hereibefore set out that on the 15th of the said month of September these Appellants had institute [...] 55 of 1891 the issues were :— 1. What possession of the plaint land are either of the parties hilthis suit entitled to by reason of the terms of the agreement of March 23rd 1891 ? 2. Havt the terms of the agreement of March 31st 1801 as to the right of possession which it conferred on either party hereto been subsequently; varied in anyway; if so 'how?. [...] In Suit 55 of 1891 he held upon the first issue that the Plaintiffs. the present Respondents were entitled to have possession of the said estate until the sale agreed upon in the agreement of 23rd March 1891 should be carried out and effected ; upon the second issue that the terms of the said agrement so far as they related to the right of possesion of the said estate had not been enbs
law
Pages
8
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday August 19 1901
cclxxxix-ccxcvi unknown view

Related Topics

All