cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes  Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts  Monday  January 2  1905

Premium

20.500.12592/v7qbjn

The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday January 2 1905

1905

superintendence of the.Police) and the collection and superintendence of the revenues of every decription within the tracts of country specified in the foregoing section which are now included in the district of Ganjam shall he vested-ie the Collector of *II& those which are now included in the district; of VIzagap ttw ie the Collector of Visgapatam and shall }).c excrcie d by them r [...] Before the passing of Act XXIV of 1839 of the Government of India entitled " an 'Acit for the Administration of Justice and collection of revenue in certain parts of the district of Ganjam and Vizagapatam " the ordinary regulations for the administration of civil and criminal justice prevailed in the agency tract. [...] 1 of 1892 was instituted on his behalf in the Court of the agent to the Governor in Vizagapatam against the first and third Respondents herein and the husband of the second Respondent for the purpose of resuming poes e of three Jerayathi villages called lokshrni Puratn Biridi and Cnina Biridi situate in Gunupur 0mA' included in the zerninclari assets of the Appellant'. [...] 1 of 1892 on the filer of the Court of the Governor's Agent in Vizagapatam and No 4 of 1893 on the file of the District Judge stating in his petition that as the High Court had no jurisdiction to transfer the suit as it had done the subsequent proceedings in it and the trial of it by the Court of the District Judge were wholly without jurisdiction - and the decree passed against was a nullity [...] The order of the agent rejecting the plaint will accordingly be upheld and the appeal dismissed." Against this order the present appeal was prferred and it was SDbrill∎ted on behalf of the Appellant that the order was altogether wrong and ought to be set aside and the case remitted to the Court of the Agent to the Governor in Vizagpatam with directions that he should admit and registe
law
Pages
8
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday January 2 1905
xxix-xxxvi unknown view

Related Topics

All