cover image: The Calcutta Weekly Notes  Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts  Monday  March 13  1905

Premium

20.500.12592/x47w5c

The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday March 13 1905

1905

It was also held that an appeal lay from the order of the Appellate Court dismissing the appeal and determining that the effect of the withdrawal of the Plaineiff was to set aside the decree of the first Court. [...] Upon this application for a new trial or verdict for Defendant the Court of Appeal held that there was no evidence in the case fit for the consideration of the jury to support the allegation that the Defedant had arrested the Plaintiff The law on that point was laid down in the above-mentioned ease. [...] The Court of first instance held that the decreholder was not entitled to get the costs of the enquiry made by the first Commissioner but that he. would get the costs of the enquiry made by the Civil Court Amin. [...] decree holder was entitled to have the costs of the first encliiiry and observed as follows :— The Appellant before me doenot suggest that the pleader was appointed at the intance of the decree-holder or that the latter was guilty of any misconduct in connection with the enquiry. [...] The case was accordingly sent back for the detemination of the question whether the Defendant ordinarily resided in the house on the outer door of which the summons was affixed.
law
Pages
8
Published in
India
SARF Document ID
sarf.100104
Segment Pages Author Actions
The Calcutta Weekly Notes Law Notes and Notes of Cases of the Calcutta High Court and of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the English Law Courts Monday March 6 1905
ci-cviii unknown view

Related Topics

All