The Calcutta Weekly Notes Monday April 29 1907

Justice Warrington had held that a majority of the shareholders could not impose the acceptance of their view upon the directors in substitution of the view on the matter of the directors themselves under the terms of the Articles co Association. [...] The case for the Plaintiff as stated in the plaint was that he was the Mohunth of the Patiala Muth in the Punjab that the Mohunths of the Madhubani Muth receive Chudder or robe of office from the Patiala Muth at the time of their intallation ; and that the properties of which he claimed to recover possession were acquired by the Mohunths of the Madhubani Muth the last of whom Mohunth Ganga Da [...] He held that it (supavdew►a) was operative inamuch as it was in subs auce a resignation of the office of M )hunth and of the charge of the trust properties to the Appellant as the superior of the endowment and the chief controlling authority in whom the trust properties were really vested. [...] In the absence of any allegation as to the precise relation between the Patiala Muth and the Madhubani Muth the Mohunth of the Madhubani Muth is not entitled to transfer the Mohuntliship of the Madhbani Muth and the title to all the properties beloning thereto to the head of the Patiala Muth. [...] The lower Appellate Court found that the holding was an occupancy holding and referring to the pottah and the khatian in the record-of-rights held that the Plaintiffs were entirle d to recover from the Defendant rent at the rate entered in the record `of-rights.